3 November 2015

I thought to share an abstract of my presentation which i am going to give at the International philosophy Day, 20th November at Peradeniya

I thought to share an abstract of my presentation which i am going to give at the International philosophy Day, 20th November at Peradeniya

Wittgenstein after Habermas

Some thoughts on the

later philosophy of Wittgenstein and its influences on ‘Critical theory’ of

Habermas

Charitha Herath

Department of Philosophy & Psychology

Ludwig Wittgenstein is considered as one

of the outstanding philosopher in the twentieth century who holds two philosophical

positions consecutively, one on his early book, Tractates Logico Philosophicus (1924) and other on his later work, Philosophical Investigation (1953). He centered

“language” as his object of inquiry which includes its ‘pictorial representation of

reality’, ‘nature of its use’ and ‘subjects inner epistemological relation of

language and its relations to outer world’. This paper focuses on Philosophical Investigation and The Blue and Brown Books (1958) and

examines main contributions of his later philosophy which subsequently ‘constructs' new theoretical domains in

anti-analytical schools of thoughts, mainly; (a) critical school of

social theory and (b) ‘hermeneutics’/ ‘deconstructs’ theorizing projects. In

particular, the paper engages critical theory of Habermas in revisiting Wittgenstein’s

influences on his ‘theories of communicative reason’ and ‘idea of discursive

ethics’. And, more importantly, the paper will go into a detailed study of the later Wittgenstein’s main inquiries such

as notion of ‘meaning as use’, ‘language games’ and ‘The idea of grammatical

investigation’; and will examine how these tools are being ‘repositioned’ in Habermas’

critical project.

As a second task, this study deals with

the theoretically accepted claim of

Habermasian theory which reads individual as an active, reflective and interpretative agents and inquires

whether such ‘ontological’ picture of human being would create counter-position

of Wittgenstein’s ‘use- value epistemological foundation’.

Key wards: Investigations, ostensive definition, private language, language game,

contextual reading, praxis, communicative reason

Normal

false

false

false

EN-US

JA

SI-LK